On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 11:10 +0000, Ron Yorston wrote: > Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >David Woodhouse (dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > >> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 16:25 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> >Dropping it may be drastic; it could be moved to extras. > >> > >> Until FC5, those two are equivalent. Having accepted that FC4/i386 isn't > >> going to fit onto 4 CDs > > > >FC4 i386 *is* going to fit on 4 CDs (almost certainly). It's x86_64 > >and possibly ppc that is over. > > and, earlier, > > Elliot Lee <sopwith@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Something that needs to be mentioned - it was decided that it was better > >to go to 5 CDs for now than to kick eclipse and the Java stuff out. > > Will you @redhat.com people please get your stories straight? > > And if it is 5 CDs can we have Xfce back, please? > Ron, This isn't about 'getting stories straight' it's not like red hat is a single mind acting in unison. It's not like any open source project is like that either. Here's the deal. Xfce got dropped out of core b/c we're trying to shave off some misc packages. Do I think it'll be in extras? Yes. I actually think it will: 1. be in extras 2. be kept more updated from extras 3. not be a problem for you. I know it's hard to believe but we're trying to get everything together and sometimes it just takes a little time. -sv
