On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 16:03 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 17:59 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > >What Seth means by anaconda not removing stuff is that in your example, > >assuming that acroread was installed as an rpm, anaconda wouldn't remove > >acroread because it's dependencies couldn't be matched, it just leaves > >the package with it's broken dependencies alone. > > Right. Anaconda doesn't actually remove the out-of-Core package itself > -- nobody suggested that it does. But it still doesn't actually _work_ > if the libraries on which it depends have been removed. so you're really only dealing with obsoletes. oh and anaconda has no way of dealing with closed source binaries really anyway - on any version of anaconda, ever. and since things have been removed from rhl and fc in the past - your argument is just a straw man. > > Btw, http://angryflower.com/itsits.gif :) BTW,. you're being a dick. -sv
