On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 17:59 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: >What Seth means by anaconda not removing stuff is that in your example, >assuming that acroread was installed as an rpm, anaconda wouldn't remove >acroread because it's dependencies couldn't be matched, it just leaves >the package with it's broken dependencies alone. Right. Anaconda doesn't actually remove the out-of-Core package itself -- nobody suggested that it does. But it still doesn't actually _work_ if the libraries on which it depends have been removed. Btw, http://angryflower.com/itsits.gif :) -- dwmw2
