Re: raise fileno limit to make Steam Proton / Wine+esync work well in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 6:15 PM Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Di, 09.10.18 14:45, Anderson, Charles R (cra@xxxxxxx) wrote:

> > It would be nice if somebody managed to find where this is patched in
> > Debian. Because I somewhat doubt that they made this change without a
> > proper discussion. And Debian is very much server oriented.
>
> Can we not have the RPM package drop a file in /etc/security/limits.d
> to set the limit only when that package is installed?  That way it
> only affects users of that package.

That only affects stuff that goes through PAM (specifically, all PAM
stacks that include pam_limits.so).

It is my intention to change this system wide, i.e. for system
services (which do not go through PAM) too.

Lennart, what is the path forward here? Should we pull in some security experts to give us recommendations on the best default value? Or are those conversations already happening somewhere else? Also, do you need any more information regarding the Wine esync use case, or has Zebediah provided sufficient data?

Thanks.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux