Re: Fedora for Web Development fail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 01:29:59PM -0000, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Is anybody interested in meeting up about this and talking through it? I
> think the website / positioning / docs type stuff is addressable, but the
> big challenge here is figuring out the strategy we want.
> 
> For example - who is using Server for what? Is the cloud base image meant
> for cloud deployments and there's another image targeted for developers
> running vms? Are they both under the same edition (right now cloud base
> images are shown under atomic) or are they separate editions? What is that
> edition / are those editions called? Are they Fedora Core OS or something
> else?
> 
> On and on. I'm happy to run discussions / brainstorming on the above and
> redesign the website (which I've been working on anyway) and help with
> marketing / etc. accordingly.

Thanks Mo! This would be incredibly valuable. And, yeah, as your questions
show, this has drifted from what I still think made sense four years ago (!)
when we did this for the F21 release.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux