On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 01:07:27PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > So I see only 2 alternatives: > a) keep comps as it is now, including optional packages, OR > b) undeprecate the RPM Group tag, readd it to all Fedora packages, and > switch back to it. > Any other plan will completely break Dnfdragora. Well, or "find plan c and work to make sure it's integrated in future versions of dnfdragora". The RPM Group tag is very inflexible — even beyond the "dewey decimal system" problem where the categories we had weren't very forward-thinking, they don't allow packages to be part of more than one group, and depend on the package maintainer rather than on group curation. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
