Hi, as CUPS maintainer, I agree with the idea of working printing as beta criteria for Fedora. I have two printers (Canon, HP) at my disposal, which I test
cups, cups-filters and hplip on when they have rebase. IMO it
would be perfect if such tests can be run every time when a
component, which CUPS requires, have an update - this way I could
get know of glibc change or nsswitch change sooner... I can cover two printer driver software, hplip and foomatic-db+foomatic with this testing (at least for these two printer models), but I would need other printers for others (like gutenprint, foo2zjs, not mention 3rd party ones like brother, lexmark, epson) and especially a printer which is capable of driver-less printing (like IPP everywhere standard, or Airprint), which is the newest way how to install printers (I mean most printers with release date after 2010). It would be great that we can test it out too... This way I would like to reach who they have such printers and
asked them for cooperation with testing - preferably on every cups
update test if printer works as it should. According cups-pdf, which is different project and isn't under my
maintenance, I'm not sure, but I'm CCing cups-pdf maintainer, if
he can say more about it. The same can be said about ghostscript -
it should be tested properly too. On 9/20/18 4:21 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
-- Zdenek Dohnal Associate Software Engineer Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx