Gene C. (czar@xxxxxxxxx) said: > 2. Lets say something major which a lot of users will want is move out of the > "core core" and into a secondary "repository" which will still be fully > maintained by Red Hat employees. No flaming intended, but lets say this is > kde and all kde associated applications. Now that would be a big chunk but > it would also be something a lot of users would want. What is the current > thinking about how this "secondary repository" will be available to the user? > Furthermore, this must be done in such a manner that it is obvious that Red > Hat is NOT slighting the packages involved. I don't see the reason why something like this would need to exist. It's almost sounds like a slight against Extras, that people wouldn't want to use it. What I would expect to happen is subdivsions of Extras into arbitrary groups that could be CD-ified; I don't think this is technically much work. > 5. There was some mention of RHEL having "extra" packages which are not part > of the RHEL on CDs. How does RHEL handle the extra packages for stand-alone > systems? They're available only in the RHN channel. Bill
