On Thu, 06 Sep 2018 11:33:20 -0700, you wrote: >On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 10:41 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> Fedora folks have been testing 3.29 for weeks now. Fedora people >> haven't been testing 3.30 because it's not really available to test. >> So I think it's reasonable for a GNOME specific change to explicitly >> state a request and expectation for a beta freeze exception for every >> Fedora release so that a .0 lands in the beta, and see if FESCo thinks >> that's sane and accepts the change. > >Uh, to be clear here: you do know that 3.29 is the development series >for 3.30, right? It's not a sudden major release jump. Effectively what >we have right now is more or less 3.30 rc0-and-a-bit; the proposal is >to go from that to 3.30 stable. Is it though in terms of what is actually in Fedora? The original message that started this stated: ---------- We are quite a bit behind with the builds, like half of GNOME is still at 3.28.x or at various stages of 3.29.x snapshots, so there's quite a bit of catching up to do. ---------- which isn't quite the same thing as saying its the same thing 3.30 rc0 Which would also appear to mean it will be a more intrusive and hence risky update than it would be if Gnome has actually been at a 3.30 rc0-and-a-bit stage. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
