> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Adam Williamson > <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 10:41 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> Fedora folks have been testing 3.29 for weeks now. Fedora people > >> haven't been testing 3.30 because it's not really available to test. > >> So I think it's reasonable for a GNOME specific change to explicitly > >> state a request and expectation for a beta freeze exception for every > >> Fedora release so that a .0 lands in the beta, and see if FESCo thinks > >> that's sane and accepts the change. > > > > Uh, to be clear here: you do know that 3.29 is the development series > > for 3.30, right? It's not a sudden major release jump. Effectively what > > we have right now is more or less 3.30 rc0-and-a-bit; the proposal is > > to go from that to 3.30 stable. > > I'm aware. > > But it's also striking me as a big deal that's no big deal, like we're > playing a game of upping the vaguarity ante. Nope, completely not, we do this most release cycles and not just gnome... it also doesn't affect any of the artifacts that don't ship gnome compents. Having been involved in this process for so long I'm kind of surprised the biggest deal of all of this is that this is a "big deal"... the fact is post beta we open up the flood gates again so this is going to be there so IMO I'd sooner it now where we can get people that do a "quick fly by beta live CD boot" before they upgrade and catch the issues now than at GA :) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
