On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 05:57:57PM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > > I don't think we should use "rawhide" to mean "rolling updates", because it > > also has the implication of "project devel stream". > Just to make sure we're on the same page: I was talking about specifying an > EOL field, not a stream name. Is that what you mean, too? Yeah. I don't think rawhide is a good EOL field. (It's actually _better_ as a stream name.) > > I know there was pushback against naming stream branches "stable", so is > > there a good _other_ way to offer this? If I name the stream branch "5" > > after the upstream major release, how do I get people in the first case > > seamlessly on to "6" when it comes out, whenever that is? > "latest" would be the best option here: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/naming-guidelines/#_module_stream_name So, I guess "latest" and "stable" are probably good standard choices. I kind of want "latest" and "slow". :) -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
