Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:47:32PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:50 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > We used to always have a Change submitted for the GNOME update, but that
> > stopped, I assume because it felt like kind of rote bureaucracy rather than
> > helpful, since it was basically the same every time. Maybe it's useful after
> > all to help keep communications open for situations like this?
> >
> It may come as no surprise given my role, but I'm in favor of
> continuing to submit Change proposals for GNOME updates and similar.
> I'd be open to a "shortcut" version of the Change process that
> essentially says "hey, we're doing this again". But this way we'd get
> visibility across teams and externally. For better or for worse, our
> Change list is a starting point for marketing and PR, so it's
> beneficial to have these sorts of things visible externally, too.
+1

For recurrent Changes, I think it is totally OK to just copy text Change page,
update the numbers and dates, and resubmit.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux