On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:04:27PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:40:47PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > We don't know the exact release version, but given the build-id > > [0aea4b30d53d7cc6386f1773a8dc8972793def1a] we should be able to > > match it against an older glibc package. > > Here are all the versions of glibc installed on that machine as far > back as the DNF logs go (which is only a couple of months > unfortunately): > > 2.26.9000-41.fc28 > 2.26.9000-48.fc28 > 2.27.9000-28.fc29 > 2.27.9000-35.fc29 > 2.28-6.fc29 > 2.28.9000-4.fc30 > 2.28-9.fc29 > > Of those only 2.27.9000-35.fc29 contains the build ID. > > That's the glibc-debuginfo that I already have installed (I realize > now why my previous email was wrong - the file is called > /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/0a/ea4b30d53d7cc6386f1773a8dc8972793def1a). > > However it still can't find a symbol matching the address, so I guess > we're out of luck. Do you have both these: glibc-debuginfo.x86_64 glibc-debuginfo-common.x86_64 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
