On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:17 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > Recent updates on f27 are blocked because openssl-devel (1.1) conflicts > with compat-openssl10-devel (1.0). A large number of packages depends on > 1.0, so the only way to upgrade is to --allowerasing, which deletes > openssl 1.1 devel packages ( > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625440 ). Those packages > used to coexist peacefully up until recently. > > I understand that we want to move to openssl 1.1 but the current reality > is that it's pushed off the system. Maybe it's not a big deal because > apparently it can be uninstalled with no ill effects. > > I don't know if it's a real conflict or a packaging artifact that could > be reverted. AIUI it's usually a real conflict. -devel packages for different versions of the same library are allowed and usually expected to conflict (for one thing, they both likely want to own the unversioned .so for the libraries themselves - e.g. /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so . It's only really a bug if the non-development library packages conflict. Is there a particular reason you need both -devel packages installed at the same time? Are you saying you only have one installed, but upgrading is trying to add the other for some reason? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
