On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 11:19:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 10:42 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > Greetings! > > > > In on week, on 2018-08-14, we will reach Fedora 29 Change > > Checkpoint:Completion deadline (testable) [1]. > > > > At this point, all accepted changes [2] should be substantially > > complete, and testable. Additionally, if a change is to be enabled by > > default, it must be enabled at Change Completion deadline as well. > > > > Change tracking bug should be set to the MODIFIED state to indicate it > > achieved completeness. > > I'm taking a look through these and updating ones that clearly *are* > testable already to MODIFIED. > > One thing I noted, it seems odd that *both* these changes appear in the > list of 'active' changes for F29: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551329 > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS230 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596190 > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231 > > surely the BINUTILS231 change supersedes the BINUTILS230 change? > Shouldn't the bugs be duped and the wiki pages cleaned up somehow? When BINUTILS231 was accepted, we said that it'll automatically replace BINUTILS230, if it goes in. Since it did go in, BINUTILS230 should just be closed as "replaced by BINUTILS230" to avoid confusing users. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/UGECPHWBYO6QXAK5VGV5KFWJLGDO7JKO/
