On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 10:42 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > Greetings! > > In on week, on 2018-08-14, we will reach Fedora 29 Change > Checkpoint:Completion deadline (testable) [1]. > > At this point, all accepted changes [2] should be substantially > complete, and testable. Additionally, if a change is to be enabled by > default, it must be enabled at Change Completion deadline as well. > > Change tracking bug should be set to the MODIFIED state to indicate it > achieved completeness. I'm taking a look through these and updating ones that clearly *are* testable already to MODIFIED. One thing I noted, it seems odd that *both* these changes appear in the list of 'active' changes for F29: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551329 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS230 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596190 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231 surely the BINUTILS231 change supersedes the BINUTILS230 change? Shouldn't the bugs be duped and the wiki pages cleaned up somehow? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/RBJNOQESJHLYKG57SB6ZMPYERJ2CL55R/
