06.08.2018, 12:49, "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 09:30:39AM +0200, Guido Aulisi wrote: >> recently serd library changed its ABI adding 1 function without >> bumping the soname. > > There's totally normal. It merely added to its ABI - it didn't change > existing ABI so nothing will break. soname change is only for when > the library deleted a symbol, or changed API contract of an existing > symbol. > >> I think adding one function should not be a problem for depending >> packages, what do you think about it? > > Correct, there's no problem. At the very most applications using the new > API would want to explicitly require a particular version of the library > RPM > ABI report for Serd: https://abi-laboratory.pro/?view=timeline&l=serd _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/SQTR6H5S24JWFFL5GA2HU4TX42CZOYH2/
