On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 09:30:39AM +0200, Guido Aulisi wrote: > recently serd library changed its ABI adding 1 function without > bumping the soname. There's totally normal. It merely added to its ABI - it didn't change existing ABI so nothing will break. soname change is only for when the library deleted a symbol, or changed API contract of an existing symbol. > I think adding one function should not be a problem for depending > packages, what do you think about it? Correct, there's no problem. At the very most applications using the new API would want to explicitly require a particular version of the library RPM Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/6AFMFKGUBAZG5P52WR3JQKESKNUHCVYX/
