Re: %{valgrind_arches}

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



W dniu 05.08.2018 o 16:36, Jeff Johnson pisze:
> So you are recommending using 14 lines (with comments) of spec file
> goop that uses 2 %ifarch build section tests in order to set/unset a
> macro.
> 
> There's further baggage in spec files needed to add a BR, pass an
> option to configure, add libraries to link, etc

Spec files are often wrote in 'I do not know other archs than x86' way.
I remember going through valgrind support for aarch64 few years ago
where changes to upstream valgrind were simple but all those packages
where %{valgrind_archs} was done in "%ifarch x86_64 i686" way required
patching and then patching...

>From what I remember there is no architecture supported by Fedora
without Valgrind support. We got rid of s390 (32bit) and risc-v does not
count yet.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/NJJBWIIHZDXNHL67YK7QV7RY7YNLIMUV/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux