On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 1:21 PM Michal Novotny <clime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 4:56 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:54 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I should test some larger package sets to see how well rpmbuild-order scales too...BTW are there any tarballs of all the fedora spec files available somewhere these days?
Thanks, Michal
I played with them a bit.
python-* had some circular BRs. perl* worked fine. Of course I tried ghc* before.
* got down to broken bcg729.spec. php* had one circular BR pair. nodejs-* seemed okay.
(I may not have all the required macros etc installed though.)
It seems to be a good way of finding broken or more exotic spec files anyway. ;)
I wrote a small script to see the most common package prefices in Fedora:
2915 perl
1995 python
1564 nodejs
729 php
661 rubygem
616 golang
461 ghc
403 rust
284 *-fonts
264 mingw
256 R
139 gnome
123 kf5
122 hunspell
110 erlang
99 drupal7
98 ocaml
85 maven
74 jboss
69 eclipse
67 sugar
58 globus
52 gap
50 apache
1995 python
1564 nodejs
729 php
661 rubygem
616 golang
461 ghc
403 rust
284 *-fonts
264 mingw
256 R
139 gnome
123 kf5
122 hunspell
110 erlang
99 drupal7
98 ocaml
85 maven
74 jboss
69 eclipse
67 sugar
58 globus
52 gap
50 apache
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/UEP6QJF5VS65N3IYK73EJ3CTXPGRMIJL/