Re: Guideline change: glibc malloc as the C/C++/Rust allocator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "FW" == Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

FW> I would like to request a change of the Packaging Guidelines,
FW> advising packagers not to interpose malloc.

How strong of a restriction are you looking for?  This sort of feels
like something which would at the strongest be a "SHOULD NOT" but maybe
you're looking for an absolute ban.

Some maintainers may find it difficult to comply with an absolute ban if
the relevant software doesn't make it easy to change the allocator.  And
some upstreams may have strong preferences for one allocator over
another (which I imagine would often be linked to performance).  Will
assistance be offered to modify affected packages?  What about
contacting upstreams?

How many packages would need to change to meet this guideline?

 - J<
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/NZPN42BDVDVDJLI7GS36HTYE4F4QNPFA/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux