Guideline change: glibc malloc as the C/C++/Rust allocator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I would like to request a change of the Packaging Guidelines, advising packagers not to interpose malloc.

The reasons are:

* We have resources to support glibc malloc, but not for other mallocs.
* Other mallocs  do not follow ABI and provide insufficient alignment.
* Choosing a malloc is workload-dependent and forcing a non-default
  malloc takes options away from system administrators.

This does not concern other allocators, such as Boehm GC or APR, only the standard malloc interfaces.

Comments?

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/43MAKHBKT5HHO6QEXQASWATMMK3TSH3K/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux