On 07/20/2018 03:58 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 15:27 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Igor Gnatenko wrote:
No one promised that I'm going to fix 100% of packages, I've fixed around
2k packages. What my regex couldn't catch -- please send me list of
packages, I will analyze them and try to fix as much as possible.
IMHO, it is unacceptable that you make a change breaking thousands of
packages and expect us to spend our time on fixing them or getting you to
fix them (and, as Hans pointed out, the latter likely takes MORE time
because of the communication overhead).
As I said previously (part which you quoted), I have fixed more than 2500
packages. I am pretty sure that the rest can be handled by maintainers.
Do you think this attitude of yours is acceptable?
IMHO, no.
You pushed out a change which obviously was insufficiently tested,
though you told us you tested it, IIRC. Now you are forcing us to wipe
up and clean up?
That said, the 2500 packages you are referring to might impress some
readers, but it doesn't impress me, because it's obvious you missed huge
classes of cases in your "testing".
IMHO, it is time to revert this Change.
ACK. This change was rushed out in an overly haste with insufficent testing.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/TDDBQJDFJMV3NRN3CE5X7C2F4V3WPUIK/
