John W. Linville wrote:
> Is it acceptable to trust the upstream signature of the wireless
> regulatory database? Or do we need to use some sort of Fedora
> signature? If the latter, can it be a (semi-)permanent (e.g. per
> release) signature, which could be maintained in the kernel sources? Or
> must it be a per build signature? How can that be accommodated, other
> than through another combined package? (My personal preference is to
> simply trust the upstream signature that is already being built into
> the kernel.)
I think the only way to ship really Free Software is to disable the
signature enforcement entirely.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/IH7OCPEQCMPWKSBPOMM3BFBH63XD4PIK/
