On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:02 AM Daniel Mach <dmach@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If a user migrates from RHEL 7 to the next version of RHEL (or CentOS),
> there will be continuity in used algorithm and history db checksums.
> It's important to some enterprise customers to keep the history db in a good shape.
> Fedora users don't care about that much in general.
>
This makes sense. Let me ask from another angle: does Fedora lose
anything from not using the current dnf history algorithm (apart from
the discontinuity when we switch)? Would it make sense to have that be
a configurable option where Fedora defaults to the dnf model and RHEL
defaults to the yum model or is it essentially a cosmetic difference?
To me, it's more a cosmetic difference and I don't think it deserves a configurable option for switching the behavior.
It is more important to unify the behavior, document it and cover with tests._______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/GGU7CFCTBGEVJOTD5TZFQTGS55P3NWUP/
