Re: dnf history - change in how rpmdb checksum is computed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:02 AM Daniel Mach <dmach@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If a user migrates from RHEL 7 to the next version of RHEL (or CentOS),
> there will be continuity in used algorithm and history db checksums.
> It's important to some enterprise customers to keep the history db in a good shape.
> Fedora users don't care about that much in general.
>
This makes sense. Let me ask from another angle: does Fedora lose
anything from not using the current dnf history algorithm (apart from
the discontinuity when we switch)? Would it make sense to have that be
a configurable option where Fedora defaults to the dnf model and RHEL
defaults to the yum model or is it essentially a cosmetic difference?

-- 
Ben Cotton
Fedora Program Manager
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/GSTZHIJFNTIOW5FWNKZ7RK4CJOC7YRBU/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux