On 07/14/2018 09:14 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:15:38AM +0200, Daniel Mach wrote: >>> koji >>> >>> koji is kinda important. I think this is meaning python2-koji? >>> I would hope python3-koji/koji stays around? >>> >> ditto > > I don't understand, will Koji still work or not? My understanding (and I hope koji developers/maintainers will jump in if I am wrong here) is that koji as client should work fine. koji as server/hub still needs work to no longer need yum. See: https://pagure.io/koji/issue/971 > I was told (I don't know for sure) that this change will break Koji. > We're using Koji on top of Fedora 29 to build Fedora/RISC-V. > > We'd love to use dnf instead of yum of course, but it seems like Koji > uses a bunch of yum APIs, rather than just using the yum command line > tool,so I've no idea how much work it's going to be to fix that. Yeah, Fedora Infrastructure's koji instances are rhel, so they should hopefully keep working. Unfortunately, I see from the above ticket that this also affects kojid, which is going to hit us. ;( So yeah, it would be very nice to have that fixed up before we drop yum. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/YRM4TVMP3PEU6WRCSOBRXDKISBE6X2FQ/
