Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 08:42 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 at 06:37, David Tardon <dtardon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> [..]
> > > My proposition is *not* to add gcc/g++ explicit to BuildReequires
> > > and
> > > use instead glibc-devel and libstdc++-devel modifications and ban
> > > use
> > > gcc/gcc-c++ in BuildRequires (in most of the cases all current
> > > gcc/g++
> > > BuildRequires could be replaced by glibc-devel and libstdc++-
> > > devel).
> > > All because it is not possible to use C compiler without glibc-
> > > devel
> > > and C++ compiler without libstdc++-devel.
> > 
> > It might be a surprise for you, but there are other implementations
> > of
> > C and C++ standard libraries. If I try to imagine Fedora wanting to
> > switch to clang in the future,
> 
> It is not

Your words that "it is not possible to use C compiler without glibc-
devel" suggest otherwise. So I think I did have a right to doubt...

>  but it is quite interesting how you are trying to move
> technical discussion to kind of "argumentum ad hominem" field.

I'm sorry if it sounded offensive. It wasn't my intention.

> > I can very well imagine it wanting to
> > switch to libc++ at the same time... So your "improved" proposal
> > is,
> > in fact, just as arbitrary and choice-limiting as the one you
> > criticize.
> 
> So you want to tell that putting explicit gcc/gcc-g++ BRs makes such
> switching (which is less important) or test build (which is way more
> interesting and valuable options) easier and/or opens some option?
> Really?
> 

Did I write that? No, I didn't. Did the e-mail I reacted on even
mentioned test builds (or %{__cc} or any other idea put forth in other
parts of this e-mail thread)? No, it didn't. So please stop putting
words in my mouth.

My _only_ argument is that this _particular_ proposal (BR: glibc-devel
/ libstdc++-devel) does have _no_ advantage over the original one (BR:
gcc / gcc-c++).

Btw, I don't like the explicit BRs on gcc/gcc-c++ myself, but that's
irrelevant here.

D.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/SFRPXMVJNBBIAULLWFRE2V2WS4QMZC5E/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux