Re: Annobin: "causes a section type conflict with..."

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neal Gompa wrote:
> Can the compiler team just merge the bloody plugin sources into the
> gcc source package so that it doesn't randomly break anymore?

I don't think that doing that is going to solve all the problems with 
Annobin. I'd rather they just turn this off by default. Annotated builds for 
analysis can be done in a side tag that never gets delivered to users, or 
even in a scratch build. I still have not seen any rationale for delivering 
packages containing annotated binaries to our users. If you want to know 
whether a package is missing compiler flags, just do a scratch rebuild of 
the SRPM with annobin enabled and analyze that.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/4NW33M5VD7VUMDXDCLHZXS7GKKD2SRQF/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux