Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jul 2018 12:18:00 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> What about just doing a mass specfile update now? I think asking
>> individual maintainers to fix their packages isn't worth their
>> time. It's a safe change,
>
> Is it? I haven't found whether this change is compatible with CentOS-6 (and 7)
> which could break them if you just build the Fedora Rawhide .spec for them.
It is. Jason mentioned this in the initial message:
> RPM has provided a sensible default since version 4.4
> (which predates FC6 and RHEL5)
I regularly build git from rawhide, which has no %defattr,
for EL-{6,7} systems.
In case anyone might find that useful or wants to confirm
that the lack of %defattr causes no issues, the COPR's are:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/git-maint/git/
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/tmz/git/
--
Todd
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Prejudice, n. A vagrant opinion without any visible means of support.
-- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/3AJR4PPZNZTN3GPOWK3G7K4NHGOBNOVA/
