Re: Packages which needlessly use %defattr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Nico.


On 07/04/2018 03:58 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Yeah, but since it's many thousands of packages, I think maybe you
> didn't have to send the whole list?
I like that he sent the whole list, then I can search for my username
and check if I am on the list.

> It's been useful for legibility, even it's no longer recommended. Is
> it really hurting anyone at this point? And is it worth the thousands
> of .spec file changes to aggressively clear?
I like to use other packages for inspiration on how things are solved,
so it would be helpful for me that packages are tend to follow good
practices.
 
> Also, it's not trivia to tell people "oh, my script is pretty safe,
> but you should please check many thousands of packages for me!!!" How
> about, instead, posting the script so we can check the syntax first?
There are no need for snide remarks, what about just asking for the script?


Peace, Jonny

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/WWLN5BOH6DGAZWEKP4WNFDLMKOSG7OS2/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux