On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > There's a lot of clouds going to uEFI now >> >> [citation needed] > ... >> I got sort of lost in Azure versus Hyper-V and gen1/gen2 - apparently Hyper-V likes >> UEFI and supports secure boot but Azure may not or something? > > Ignoring the question of how many is a lot, I think you may just be > discussing the difference between the first gen and current gen Azure > cloud. They definitely support UEFI, at least in some configuration. > >> > The other advantage of having a uEFI partition is you can boot one >> > image on hardware and VM, I'm planning that with IoT. >> >> I later found out that some OpenStack installations like to do this too. >> >> So...I agree we should probably do this, particularly if Ubuntu already is today. > > The annoying thing about the hybrid strategy is it means keeping > grub-install around for BIOS. But that means it has to be on the thing > making images, not in the image itself. At one time the VM images were using extlinux for BIOS, and extlinux is quite a lot smaller than grub-install and grub-mkconfig. The ISO images are definitely using isolinux not GRUB. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/5BKSDS6MYOJ7HAMAMJBOOP3PPWSFRIUG/
