Re: FC4 slimfast slimfest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Havoc Pennington wrote:
[...]
2) maybe we are willing to consider removing anything,
if so I propose this approach:
- create "profiles" of complete sets of packages that some
common audiences would want; avoid duplicate-functionality/
indecision as much as possible in those


 - try to include/exclude complete profiles

for example, a complete "corporate desktop",
"mail server", "print server", "file server", "sysadmin
workstation", "C programming environment", "java programming environment", etc.


dump entire use cases like that; and dump multiple ways to do a single use case.

 Rationale: it's stupid to include half of a use case, since
 you are already causing that person to go to Extras, you
 may as well send them there for everything.

Havoc



Brilliant idea. Solves all our problems, but creates a set of new one.

Like, for example, what will the ISOs look like?


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux