Le lundi 21 fÃvrier 2005 Ã 22:14 +0000, David Woodhouse a Ãcrit : > On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 22:19 +0100, FÃliciano Matias wrote: > >Le lundi 21 fÃvrier 2005 Ã 13:54 -0700, Joshua Eichorn a Ãcrit : > >> How about dropping some of the random documentation rpms we keep around, > >> they don't follow a pattern anyway (ie we have exim-doc but no > >> postfix-doc, we have python-doc but no php-doc or perl-doc) > >> > > > >I am not agree. If we provide exim, we provide *all* exim. > > Exim has the best documentation ever I've seen for any Free Software > project; it'd be a shame to drop it. But then again, it's available on > the web too, and the HTML version is probably the most usable because of > the indexing etc. So we could reasonably drop it. So we could "reasonably" drop gcc, *-devel, ... Not a good idea. > > -- > dwmw2 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
