On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 02:22:49PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:04:25AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > >>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > >>> <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>> > I wanted to submit a PR for this, but I wasn't sure what the proper > >>> > location is. /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros (from redhat-rpm-config) or > >>> > /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.fedora (from fedora-rpm-macros)? > >>> > > >>> > >>> redhat-rpm-config is the right place. It belongs in /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros. > >> > >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/22 > > > > So you're not actually adding a feature, as the pull request seems to > > describe. You're simply resetting the default from "0" to "numerical > > equivalent of 2 years", for all applications. Why not simply alter it > > for kernel.ll other packages unmodified? > > That came out somewhat garbled. > > Why not simply alter it for kernel.spec, and leave alone other > packages that may use the same macro? This seems to be misunderstanding. This has nothing to do with kernel.spec in particular. That PR trims _all_ changelogs, on purpose. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
