On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 05:52:05PM +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 10:25 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 07:20:18PM +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 19:50 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > > > > I did another mass rebuild with a specially-tweaked gcc in order > > > > to > > > > find out > > > > which packages need to be rebuild with patched gcc-8.0.1-0.16. > > > > > > How we find out the same problem in packages from external repos ? > > > > I don't know; I've only rebuilt all rawhide packages. > > You rebuilt all packages and found what packages was different ? that'sit ? The bug affected solely x86_64 and the test mass rebuilt was thus performed solely on x86_64, on non-koji boxes (even when the compiler for checking this was twice as slow as normally). Rebuilding all packages again on all architectures would be certainly much more CPU time. Jakub _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
