On Wed, Feb 21, 2018, 16:39 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:56:23AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:35 AM, Mohan Boddu <mboddu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Hi All,
> >> >
> >> > Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> >> > --rebase to pick up the new branch,
> >>
> >> One of my packages (syncthing) didn't get the new "f28" branch, is
> >> there a reason why?
> >> (It's not retired in rawhide.)
> >
> > It's not part of the package provided by the script updating pdc, but that's a
> > symptom, I do not know why the script did not consider it.
> >
> > Looking at pdc, it looks like syncthing has no master branch at all:
> > https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/rest_api/v1/component-branches/?active=true&global_component=syncthing
>
> Well, that's ... unusual, I'd say?
> Whom do I have to poke to fix the pdc database entries, and to get an
> f28 branch?
Just request the f28 as you would for any branches (you may want to request
master as well while at it :)).
Done! It's fixed now (although the master branch seems to have re-appeared in its own). Thank you!
Fabio
Seeing the chatter on the list earlier, it seems fedrepo_req will work better
for f28 for the moment.
Pierre
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
