On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:56:23AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:35 AM, Mohan Boddu <mboddu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Hi All, > >> > > >> > Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull > >> > --rebase to pick up the new branch, > >> > >> One of my packages (syncthing) didn't get the new "f28" branch, is > >> there a reason why? > >> (It's not retired in rawhide.) > > > > It's not part of the package provided by the script updating pdc, but that's a > > symptom, I do not know why the script did not consider it. > > > > Looking at pdc, it looks like syncthing has no master branch at all: > > https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/rest_api/v1/component-branches/?active=true&global_component=syncthing > > Well, that's ... unusual, I'd say? > Whom do I have to poke to fix the pdc database entries, and to get an > f28 branch? Just request the f28 as you would for any branches (you may want to request master as well while at it :)). Seeing the chatter on the list earlier, it seems fedrepo_req will work better for f28 for the moment. Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
