Re: to batch or not to batch?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/19/2018 03:40 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On 02/19/2018 06:34 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> But anyway, why don't we
>> have "updates-testing", "updates-batched" and "updates" repositories?
>> "updates-batched" could be enabled by default while "updates" could be
>> enabled manually if one wishes.
> 
> When we talked about this in the past I believe resources were the
> concern, both on the Fedora infrastructure side and on the mirroring side.

I think a new, additional repo with batched contents should solve a lot
of problems here: we'd have both side of the fence happy (regular users:
batched updates, developers: continuous stream of updates), and it would
also make it possible to actually QA the batched set before it hits the
mirrors.

Right now there's no way for QA to only extract batched updates without
getting all the rest of updates-testing; if we had that we could
actually have people test the batched set of updates before they are
pushed out to stable.

P.S. Those who were at the Atomic Workstation call that ended a few
minutes ago, I believe this is what we need to solve the split updates
problem that we talked about.

-- 
Kalev
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux