On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:13:19PM +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 2018-02-16, 17:38 GMT, Daniel P Berrangé wrote: > > Yes, but that's likely a small % of overall and it is harmless > > if we addd BR: gcc to a few packages which don't need it > > - they'll be no worse off than they are today, and it can be > > easily removed again. > > By “adding BR: gcc” you mean committing actual changes to SPEC > files or creating pull requests on src.fp.o ? I'm suggesting committing actual changes. Creating several 1000 pull requests is just as much a burden on maintainers as expecting them to edit several 1000 specs themselves. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
