Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 17/02/2018 à 10:05, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
> On Sat, 2018-02-17 at 07:08 +0100, Remi Collet wrote:
>> Le 16/02/2018 à 15:18, Mark Wielaard a écrit :
> 
>>> I had to tweak it a little though so the spec could still be build
>>> older RHEL or Fedora (I reuse the spec to build on RHEL and with SCL).
>>> Maybe something like the following is better for people who have a spec
>>> file they might reuse on systems that might not have this macro:
>>>
>>> # Only the latest Fedora and EPEL have these scriptlets,
>>> # older, or not up to date, Fedora and plain RHEL don't.
>>> %if 0%{?ldconfig_scriptlets:1}
>>> %ldconfig_scriptlets libs
>>> %ldconfig_scriptlets libelf
>>> %else
>>> %post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig
>>> %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig
>>> %post libelf -p /sbin/ldconfig
>>> %postun libelf -p /sbin/ldconfig
>>> %endif
> 
>> Even simpler
> 
>> %if 0%{?fedora} < 28
>> %post   libs   -p /sbin/ldconfig
>> %postun libs -  p /sbin/ldconfig
>> %post   libelf -p /sbin/ldconfig
>> %postun libelf -p /sbin/ldconfig
>> %endif
> 
> This is wrong because. This macro is defined on all EPEL and Fedora, so Mark's
> way is correct (almost).
> 
>> Because the ldconfig_scriptlets stuff only work in koji, not in other
>> build system (brew, cbs, ...)
> 
> This is not a problem for Fedora.

This is exactly what Mark message was about (older RHEL or Fedora)

Definitively we have a very different vision of packaging.

You are trying to impose "your vision" as the only acceptable one
without any respect for other packagers which may have different vision
and different goal.

And this is probably the reason of some much discussions about recent
changes.

And this create so much frustration on my side (and perhaps some
others), BTW, we will never agree.

And another point, message for all packagers, you don't have to take
care of maintaining your package, Igor the robot will do the work for you.

IMHO, we should explain things, explain why they are needed, and
encourage people to understand and do their work.




Remi, terribly disappointed by the way the project goes.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux