Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/16/2018 12:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 09:54 +0100, nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
...snip...
>>
>> Right now rawhide has to be *very* broken for it to get any attention.
> 
> No it does not. This is not true. Rawhide is tested every day and I
> (and several others) pay attention to the results and attempt to get
> bugs fixed as quickly as possible.

Yeah, what Adam said. I run rawhide full time on my laptop and work to
get issues I hit fixed before they even land in rawhide for others.

I admit that when we have a branched and are near beta/final there's
less help for rawhide, but I at least still do care along with a few
others.

I don't think we are going to really get things better than now until we
start gating packages (which is very tricky). I hope we will be doing
that later this year tho.

kevin



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux