>>>>> "NG" == Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> writes: NG> As upstream for rpmlint, I do not believe anyone cares at all about NG> rpmlint in Fedora. We seemingly care so little for it that the rpmlint status appears on every bodhi update. I did spend some time trying to make rpmlint better ages ago and kind of got blocked by the restriction that it (at the time) had to conform to whatever RHEL4 wanted. But that was obviously a long time ago. NG> Until we can fail builds on rpmlint errors (as both Mageia and NG> openSUSE do), it's pointless to consider rpmlint as something that NG> ensures things stay clean and sane. If you can tolerate no false positives from rpmlint then there must be a pile of things it doesn't look at. I always saw it as a useful advisory tool but have difficulty imagining that you could gate off of it. What I did was hack my local setup (which does auto-rpmlint directly within vim) to accept magic comments to tell it to stop complaining about certain things. I recall suggesting that upstream a long time ago but not having much luck. But again, we're talking over a decade here. - J< _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
