-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 09:39 +0100, Marian Csontos wrote: > I wonder, when there is a %check in spec, and the testsuite requires > more packages than BuildRequires, is there a way to have them installed > only if check is running? This has been brought up few time... There is nothing like that. The consensus, IIRC, was to use %bcond_without check and have %if %{with check} BuildRequires: ... %endif same for %check section itself. I think someone wanted to implement this generally in RPM, but this didn't happen. > Or shall I just throw them in as BuildRequire`s? Yes. - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlqD+cEACgkQaVcUvRu8 X0zwmA//XPNf9ZitR5HU0azJJxifIv982/ZiDhEZh/newKtni2FMNE4Q53n734yT rx+pyYsaR2stbASR4DrOUTq/6MjEkCFhLs5Dm+bRi1TC34t6QD8/VHh6qu2KAWqM OPEUE85rEGW8E3glv4aZCNll6TBlJcok2XvnP0LgfcNtQLhvc/GLzGMjtkze2t+H B3iWXj/g10WhCGQ6TV7xxCdlBoDEkusLWHGyxpD/mOKdN7JW9Tkplmz5kJirOmf5 +yMQhG6O3lzfL3bXw8JMJ2FocSYL+rD8agbu59xSE2QMGx0zwWjzvh5M6+ji7UPF UQUf9JhHrf42SRYDbP11P2u3k6Y9IwioPqa+BUfqJEMO9cEM8yk0OIoPPuUjLCKt 3TAqmd6tYgp4K3wMvrc3tofFccPnLdYIHWsLHuiVKIV3qZn19d3acK/kL66bULk2 laG2hFaDD9/DLoEoome/FnqIpW25Czmpr24aotaF0wskCVSmC9PCsfqw2KJk4ugZ tVAu9IDkCOIL7qzx/Eg6AH2AQa/BN2L1B6kt1i8DLmkdO9Oer5ZK0Uc+9MR8Mxvd zpNr15kJzuyytqxcQsrbrYX4nci2iacBIWPJZEYYyU2Uw/PbiAhizY8VA2WO7Xd8 zjqo8M2CaFzQlZtxXsv6XDg5AEXCMA/pI/YR7+vlIkM6PMDMuOc= =1auY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx