On Friday, February 9, 2018 9:25:33 AM CET Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 08:57 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Thursday, February 8, 2018 5:02:10 PM CET Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > It seems that a lot of people have %file, %check, %build, %whatsoever in > > > their > > > changelog section. > > > > > > Is there any reason I should not go and automatically escape them? > > > > There's IMO no good reason why you should. > > > > I wouldn't use proven packager rights if the package builds fine. Fill a > > pull request if anything. > > Then I have doubts that %changelog means anything It means something but it is not that important to not ship such package. > because whoever uses rpm -- changelog would see unexpanded macro so if > you had %autosetup -p1 in there, users would see real commands > instead... And also it might break in some cases which requires > maintainer intervention. I only said why I wouldn't use _my_ provenpackager powers for innocent issues. > Also I don't see reason why I should send PR for ~500 packages where most of it > won't be merged ever. And this will create much more problems for me to track > this issue rather than just going and fixing all of them. Though it only delayed (lowered priority of) the real solution ... > > E.g. server-side git hook refusing commits "adding typos" into changelog > > would solve it once and forever. If you were able to implement some > > systematic change like this then I would excuse the walk across all the > > spec files to fix old issues.. > > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7300 .. like this. Thanks! Pavel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx