Dne 8.2.2018 v 16:39 Kamil Dudka napsal(a): > On Thursday, February 8, 2018 4:21:53 PM CET Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: >> On 8 February 2018 at 15:03, Kamil Dudka <kdudka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> [..] >> >>> There might be valid reasons for the old stuff appearing in _some_ spec >>> files >>> beyond your knowledge, for example specfile maintained by upstream, usable >>> not >>> only by Fedora. >> Theoretically you may be right. In practice .. nope. >> There is no any reasons to use in Fedora spec file which is not >> readable/simple as it is only possible because someone who is not focused >> on Fedora want to make it universal without testing it on all possible >> distributions on every new version released. >> >> kloczek > For example logrotate upstream maintains a spec file that is regularly updated > and CI-tested by Travis: > > https://github.com/logrotate/logrotate/commits/master/logrotate.spec.in > > Spec files of csdiff, cscppc, csmock, and cswrap are produced by make-srpm.sh > maintained in the upstream git repositories. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Spec_Maintenance_and_Canonicity Not saying it contradicts the guideline above, just FYI. V. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
