Hi, >> I'd love to see OOo2(beta) incorporated into rawhide today if truth be >> told as it is way and above better than the standard OOo. I can see the >> RH arguments against it though, but given that the schedule for both to >> be released is about the same time, a small delay in FC4 to incorporate >> it would be acceptable (IMO at least). > >Fedora isn't just about OOo though. There are a lot of other packages in the >distribution and slipping FC4 just to wait for a build of OOo that may/may not >be coming out soon after the FC4 freeze date seems a bit presumptuous. However, >since it is a fairly important app, its schedule may get more weight than, say, >gcalctool. As we get nearer to the freeze, we'll have a clearer picture of the >schedules of both FC4 and OOo 2.0, and Fedora has been known to slip due to >other reasons too. Fair enough. I'm not sure how important it comes in the stakes, but IMO, it's well up there with the developer toolchain. TTFN Paul -- "I don't know how World War III will be fought, but I do know World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones" - Einstein
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
