On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Paul wrote: > >By including ooo 1.9.x in FC4 test1, more people will test it. There are > >already rpms available on people.redhat.com. Please report ooo bugs at > >http://www.openoffice.org/issues/enter_bug.cgi > >and packaging bugs at > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora% > >20Core& > > I'd love to see OOo2(beta) incorporated into rawhide today if truth be > told as it is way and above better than the standard OOo. I can see the > RH arguments against it though, but given that the schedule for both to > be released is about the same time, a small delay in FC4 to incorporate > it would be acceptable (IMO at least). Fedora isn't just about OOo though. There are a lot of other packages in the distribution and slipping FC4 just to wait for a build of OOo that may/may not be coming out soon after the FC4 freeze date seems a bit presumptuous. However, since it is a fairly important app, its schedule may get more weight than, say, gcalctool. As we get nearer to the freeze, we'll have a clearer picture of the schedules of both FC4 and OOo 2.0, and Fedora has been known to slip due to other reasons too. Dan
