On 12/30/2017 09:44 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi, Till.
>
> On Saturday, 30 December 2017 at 17:27, Till Hofmann wrote:
> [...]
>> So, I'm wondering:
>> 1. Can I add "Provides: bear = %{version}-%{release}", as bear does not
>> provide a bear binary package? To me, this seems risky and confusing,
>> but it would solve the issue.
>> 2. If not, would it make sense to rename the current bear (source)
>> package into something else, e.g., bear-factory, so we can use 'bear'
>> for the compilation database?
>
> Option 2 makes most sense in light of what you wrote. Thank you for
> the thorough research on this matter. If I were the current bear
> package maintainer, I'd agree with your reasoning.
>
I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539207.
Kind regards,
Till
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
