On 01/18/2018 01:16 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 01/18/2018 03:23 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: >> (This is meant for the Fedora devel mailing list, but I've cc'd the >> nfs-ganesha mailing list in the hopes that they might see something I'm >> missing) >> >> The latest release of the LizardFS distributed filesystem includes a >> FSAL for NFS Ganesha, allowing you to mount a LizardFS filesystem using >> NFS (or pNFS, if you prefer). > > The LizardFS FSAL is GPLv3. NFS-Ganesha is LGPLv3+. > > From a Fedora packaging standpoint is it acceptable to build a GPLv3 > plug-in for an otherwise LGPLv3+ binary? > > If the licenses were reversed, I'd be reasonably confident that that > combination is okay. > > What sayeth our "I'm not a lawyer but I play one on Fedora Devel mailing > list" legal beagles? And yes, I've already sent a query to a Real Lawyer™ -- Kaleb _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
